Recently, the application of LED industry enterprises launched the "337 investigation" caused widespread concern. The following enterprises Alto Electronics (29) yesterday morning issued a statement in response, Chau Ming technology also issued a related announcement yesterday evening announcement.
Chau Ming technology, the company has always attached importance to the protection of intellectual property rights, and has a strong sense of patent protection and management. The company has its own independent intellectual property rights fully, apply and protect workers specialized departments and professional responsible for intellectual property rights, in respect of intellectual property rights of others also committed through legal means to ensure the independent intellectual property rights from infringement. Up to now, the company holds a total of more than 630 patents in the world, according to the survey of 337 events, the company will take a proactive attitude to deal with.
In addition, the company's LED display products in the United States before the listing, will carry out a wide range of patent infringement retrieval, risk prevention initiative to export products infringe patents related to intellectual property rights.
Chau Ming technology also said that the United States of Chinese LED product launch 337 investigation is not the first time, early in 2008 6, China LED company was sued and 4 of them were included in the ITC 337 survey, Chau Ming technology is one of them. In 2008, the company actively responding, and earnestly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the company, the company has rich experience in dealing with the similar matters.
On the impact of the "377 investigation", in addition to the statement in response to other enterprises, the industry also have expressed their views.
Trendforce LEDinside consulting analyst Wang Fei said, "337 investigation" of American enterprises has been used in other countries, weakening the competitiveness of enterprises is one of the means, launched a very low cost. LED industry often will encounter a year."
Some people think, "this is the speculative behavior of individual enterprises in Sino US trade war in the background, and the LED display to China expressed indignation and strong dissatisfaction for enterprises initiated the" 377 investigation "approach to the looting, disrupt the market order of LED motivation and purpose expressed serious concern. The "377 investigation" should will not impact on our businesses related to business development and performance."
Related reading:
US company launched the "337 investigation" of 11 LED screen enterprises, alto electronics issued a statement in response to
LED more information, please click on the LED network or the WeChat public account (cnledw2013).
Contact: mack
Phone: 13332979793
E-mail: mack@archled.net
Add: 3rd Floor, Building A, Mingjinhai Second Industrial Zone, Shiyan Street, Baoan, Shenzhen,Guangdong,China